Skip to main content

Full text of "USPTO Patents Application 09602418"

See other formats


United States Patent and Trademark Office 



UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 
United States Patent and Trademark Ofllce 
Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS 
P.O. Box 1450 

Alexandria, Virginia 223 13-1450 
www.uspio-gov 



APPLICATION NO. 


FILING DATE 


FIRST NAMED INVENTOR 


ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. 


CONFIRMATION NO. 


09/602,418 


06/23/2000 


Marek Musial 


6963 US 


9398 



30078 7590 02/21/2007 

MATTHEW D. RABDAU 
TEKTRONIX, INC. 
14150 S.W. KARL BRAUN DRIVE 
P.O. BOX 500 (50-LAW) 
BEAVERTON, OR 97077-0001 



EXAMINER 



JUNG, MIN 



ART UNIT 



PAPER NUMBER 



2616 



SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD OF RESPONSE 



MAIL DATE 



DELIVERY MODE 



3 MONTHS 02/21/2007 PAPER 

Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. 

If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire 6 MONTHS 
from the mailing date of this communication. 



PTOL-90A (Rev. 10/06) 



Office Action Summary 


Application No. 

09/602,418 


Applicant(s) 

MUSIAL, MAREK 


Examiner 

Min Jung 


Art Unit 

2663 





The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address 
Period for Reply 



A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTH(S) OR THIRTY (30) DAYS, 
WHICHEVER IS LONGER, FROM THE MAILING DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION. 

- Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1 .136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed 
after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. 

- If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. 

- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133). 
Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any 
earned patent temri adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b). 

Status 

1 )S Responsive to comnnunication(s) filed on 30 November 2006 . 
2a)S This action is FINAL 2b)n This action is non-final. 

3) n Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is 

closed in accordance with the practice under Ex parte Quayle, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213. 

Disposition of Claims 

4) S Claim(s) 2-14 and 16 is/are pending in the application. 

4a) Of the above claim(s) is/are withdrawn from consideration. 

5) n Claim(s) is/are allowed. 

6) ^ Claim(s) 2-14 and 16 is/are rejected. 
?)□ Claim(s) is/are objected to. 

8) n Claim{s) are subject to restriction and/or election requirement. 

Application Papers 

9) 0 The specification is objected to by the Examiner. 

10) 0 The drawing(s) filed on is/are: a)n accepted or b)n objected to by the Examiner. 

Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1 .85(a). 
Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d). 

1 1) 0 The oath or declaration is objected to by the Examiner. Note the attached Office Action or form PTO-152. 

Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 

12) ^ Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f). 
aM All b)n Some * c)^ None of: 

1 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received. 

2. n Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No. . 

3. n Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage 

application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)). 
* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received. 



Attachment(s) 

1) □ Notice of References Cited (PTO-892) 

2) n Notice of Draftsperson's Patent Drawing Review (PTO-948) 

3) O Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08) 

Paper No(s)/Mail Date . 



4) n Interview Sunnmary (PTO-413) 

Paper No(s)/Mall Date. . 

5) n Notice of Informal Patent Application 

6) □ Other: . 



U.S. Patent and Trademartt OfTice 
PTOL-326 (Rev. 08-06) 



Office Action Summary 



Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20070215 



Application/Control Number: 09/602,418 
Art Unit: 2663 



Page 2 



DETAILED ACTION 

Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 

1 . 35 U.S.C. 1 01 reads as follows: 

Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of 
matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the 
conditions and requirements of this title. 

2. Claims 2-14, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed 
invention lacks patentable utility. The present invention is directed to data manipulation 
for the purpose of protocol analysis. For example, claim 2 recites grouping times, which 
comprises a calculating step and a forming step. What is recites here is an abstract idea 
since a practical application is lacking. The steps performed are merely data 
manipulation and therefore lacks physical application that produces a useful, tangible, 
and concrete result. 

Response to Arguments 

3. Applicant's arguments filed November 30, 2006 have been fully considered but 
they are not persuasive. 

Applicant argues that the claims are "useful" because it facilitates the validation 
and smooth functioning of communication systems, "concrete" because it is 
reproducible and predictable, and "tangible' because it corresponds to a useful, 
concrete or tangible thing: a protocol implementation of a communication system. 

Examiner would like to point out again that the recited steps are directed to data 
manipulation. The end result of the recited invention, in claim 2, for example, is a set of 



Application/Control Number: 09/602,418 Page 3 

Art Unit: 2663 

data, i.e., the equivalence classes are formed from the similarity matrix. There is no 
application of the end result, and the end result does not even justify the preamble of "a 
method of learning a finite automaton..."; where is the "learning"? who or what has 
learned? 

Applicant's disclosure in the specification may be useful, but the claims do not 
recite any post solution activity or physical transformation of the manipulated data. 
Claims do not include application of the end result regarding validation and smooth 
functioning of communication systems. The claims do not produce concrete result 
because the end results are numbers or logic conditions, which are abstract ideas 
lacking a practical application. The claims are not tangible, and the steps recited do not 
specifically relate the end result to protocol implementation of a communication system. 

Therefore, examiner's position is maintained with regard to the rejection under 35 
use 101. 

Conclusion 

4. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time 
policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1 . 1 36(a). 

A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE 
MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within 
TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not 
mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the 
shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any 



Application/Control Number: 09/602,418 



Page 4 



Art Unit: 2663 

extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of 
the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later 
than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 

5. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the 
examiner should be directed to Min Jung whose telephone number is 571-272-3127. 
The examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Friday 9:00 - 5:00. 

If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's 
supervisor, Wellington Chin can be reached on 571-272-3134. The fax phone number 
for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. 

Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the 
Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for 
published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. 
Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. 
For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should 
you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic 
Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a 
USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information 
system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. 



MJ 

February 15, 2007 




Primary Examiner